In <[email protected]>, on 07/30/2013
at 03:01 PM, Ed Gould <[email protected]> said:
>That is true but the outlawing of alter goto's have been written in
>stone for decades.
At some shops, but I've seen messages here from people at shops where
they are required to use the old unstructured constructs rather than
the newer structured constructs.
>I am and always been for outlawing parts of COBOL that should not
>have been allowed in the first place.
How do you feel about shops that mandate the use of parts of COBOL
that should not have been allowed in the first place?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
Atid/2 <http://patriot.net/~shmuel>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
