In
<CAE1XxDFcxy3Q2+8S84Qu2tyH9wrnyyT0g6Ni6s-=9wrd+em...@mail.gmail.com>,
on 08/01/2013
at 05:50 PM, John Gilmore <[email protected]> said:
>What seems to have fallen through the cracks in this [tangential]
>discussion is that the use of code-modification schemes, ALTER and
>the like, in a routine makes it non-reentrant.
Not necessarily, but still bad form.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
Atid/2 <http://patriot.net/~shmuel>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
