In <[email protected]>, on
08/01/2013
at 06:30 PM, Paul Gilmartin <[email protected]> said:
>One might imagine restoring reentrancy by making the alterable
>fragments pointers into obtained storage.
Or serializing when it matters. But such code is usually harder to
maintain.
>Almost as bad as code-modification is the use in C of function
>pointers in structs.
You mean an object that has methods?
>PSA makes z/OS partly reentrant.
Partly? The use of, e.g., ENQ, latches, locks appears to make it fully
reentrant.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
Atid/2 <http://patriot.net/~shmuel>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
