On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 5:27 PM, Peter Relson <[email protected]> wrote:
> I don't know why LE would issue an ESPIE if you told it not to. It > certainly seems from the evidence that something is issuing ESPIE. > And it's issuing it in your state, which is supervisor state, which > therefore will result in the abend you received. > Is it possible that what you think are the options that you provided are, > in fact, not? > This is a possibility and I will check it carefully. However, if supervisor mode is entered prior to any subtask being attached, the process runs to completion without abend. The 46d-18 only occurs when the PROCESS subtask is the only subtask which enters supervisor mode. My current thinking is that the exception routine needs to be coded in the CEEPIPI service routine vector. That will be checked next. > As to > >You might be asking, why I'm doing this. The answer is that eventually, > I > >want to be able to run the C/C++ programs that are setup in the SUB_DP > >environment under an SRB. This is documented in Language Environment > >Vendor Interfaces (SA22-7568). This will allow me to offload C/C++ code > to > >a zIIP engine. > > I can say only "maybe". In general, only if you are licensed to do so (and > of course if the SRBs are enclave SRBs). > Agreed on both points. A valid license is hand. > > Peter Relson > z/OS Core Technology Design > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
