In
<caajsdjg5av6yb9rjqg1kachxzapvcwcz9gzt65srhkyegyf...@mail.gmail.com>,
on 08/27/2013
at 12:51 PM, John McKown <[email protected]> said:
>So I thought it might be a good idea to use the CEESGL function to
>"throw an exception" instead of just returning a return code which
>could be ignored. Does this sound reasonable?
Yes.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
Atid/2 <http://patriot.net/~shmuel>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
