Step 1 of 26 jobs that run weekly here... all virtual 3490. IEC205I O4170811,I4172TAM,OSSORT,FILESEQ=1, COMPLETE VOLUME LIST, DSN=SYS13221.T024827.RA000.I4172TAM.R0536336, VOLS=V99685,W48653,W49651,W51394,W49733,W51426,W51740,W50789, VOLS=W53558,W51451,W53648,W54852,W55272,W53187,W58534,W53865, VOLS=V88953,V49754,V84397,V54602,W57132,W48285,V98618,W61367, VOLS=W61484,W64410,V37807,V26144,V61036,V32871,V26218,V26564, VOLS=V32907,V26632,TOTALBLOCKS=3393517
Jay Campbell IBM OS Support Section -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Gibney, Dave Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2013 3:03 PM To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu Subject: Re: Syncsort v1.4 doesn't support Tape sorting - Need help ! Unless you are really out of the ordinary, I would expect the use of SORTWKnn on tape to be rare. AFAIK, It's purpose was for large sorts in the ancient days of expensive disk. It took extra effort to set-up. I believe we had one job back in the 80's and it was changed away from TAPESORT at some time in the 90's. Dave Gibney Information Technology Services Washington State University -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2013 11:33 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Syncsort v1.4 doesn't support Tape sorting - Need help ! I hope there's still some sort of centralised control and/or library. - Ted MacNEIL eamacn...@yahoo.ca Twitter: @TedMacNEIL -----Original Message----- From: Roger Steyn <roger.st...@yahoo.com> Sender: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2013 11:29:12 To: <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> Reply-To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> Subject: Re: Syncsort v1.4 doesn't support Tape sorting - Need help ! Yes . That would work fine in the case of scheduled jobs . But in our shop,there is one more challenge that we have a lot of Auto-sched jobs (jobs that are trigerred externally from an MQ server ). And i do not know how many of them use tape sorting . This makes the task more difficult . ________________________________ From: Paul Gilmartin <paulgboul...@aim.com> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Sent: Tuesday, September 3, 2013 8:15 PM Subject: Re: Syncsort v1.4 doesn't support Tape sorting - Need help ! On Tue, 3 Sep 2013 09:34:26 -0500, Eric Bielefeld wrote: > >Can't you use a program that will read the members of a pds and search for >UNIT=TAPE on SORTWKnn DD statements? You should be able to search all of >your production libraries fairly quickly to identify all of the jobs. >Hopefully you have standards so that production is all in a small set of >libraries. I know there is a program on the CBT tape that allows you to do >that. Since I've retired, I forgot what it was. > SuperC? (not available from CBT.) -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
