In
<caarmm9tsfrlc3zzj2fspy8kmu90crt8j714oxgvijlz7q4y...@mail.gmail.com>,
on 09/03/2013
at 10:43 PM, Tony Harminc <[email protected]> said:
>But Dynalloc did not exist until MVS,
Not as a supported facility for user code, but it was there for use by
DAIR in TSO. As I recall, the interface was different.
>and MVS has never restricted its use to TSO.
True, but PASS is still intended for the situation where there is a
receiving DD in a subsequent step. Within the same step, KEEP and PASS
are equivalent.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
Atid/2 <http://patriot.net/~shmuel>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
