Hi,

yes it was the right field and column. I have made a mistake in calculating the 
value. 96 is right. RMF does add up some SMF records which are in a short 
period of time. It is too complicated to describe hearer but now it works for 
me.

Thank you for your help.

Cheers
Uwe

Am 23.09.2013 um 00:57 schrieb Charles Mills <[email protected]>:

> Are you sure that's the right sub-type? I don't know this SMF record type at
> all but CB3EBAB7 4D1D6525 seems a little implausible as a " Structure
> version number." (However, the first 16 and the next two byte values look
> right.)
> 
> I can't convert floating point in my head but is not 42 hex = 66 decimal =
> an exponent of 66 - 64 = 2? FWIW, the field at +34 does appear to be the sum
> of the next three fields (two of which are zero).
> 
> HTH,
> 
> Charles
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On
> Behalf Of Uwe Oswald
> Sent: Saturday, September 21, 2013 9:25 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: R744STRC SMF Field
> 
> Hi @all,
> 
> hope someone can help me. I got stuck on a problem with a SMF field. Have
> someone ever tried to analyze a SMF74 ST 4 (Coupling Facility Activity)
> record. I do not see the value 5425 as a long floating point value in the
> record in any field. Can someone point me into the right direction?
> 
> HELP.
> 
> Thx
> Uwe
> 
> Here is the RMF CF Report output
> 
> ********************************* TOP OF DATA
> **********************************
>                                       C O U P L I N G   F A C I L I T Y   A
> C
> 
>       z/OS V1R13              SYSPLEX PRDPLEX             DATE 09/14/2013
>                               RPT VERSION V1R13 RMF       TIME 05.59.38
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -
>   COUPLING FACILITY NAME = RZAC1P1
>   TOTAL SAMPLES(AVG) =   897  (MAX) =   898  (MIN) =   896
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -
>                                               COUPLING  FACILITY  USAGE
> SUMMA
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -
>   STRUCTURE SUMMARY
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -
> 
>                                                  % OF             % OF    %
> OF
>          STRUCTURE                       ALLOC   CF          #    ALL
> CF
>   TYPE   NAME              STATUS CHG    SIZE    STOR      REQ    REQ
> UTIL
> 
>   LIST   DB2D_SCA          ACTIVE         33M     0.2     5425     0.5
> 0.4
> 
> The bold marked value is R744STRC from my point of view.
> 
> In ERBSHOW I see this block.
> 
>  #13:  +0000:  C4C2F2C4 6DE2C3C1 40404040 40404040  *DB2D_SCA        *
>        +0010:  CB3EBAB7 4D1D6525 01800000 00009651  *ô ¬¼( Á  Ø    oé*
>        +0020:  00000082 00000000 00000000 00000000  *   b            *
>        +0030:  00000000 42600000 00000000 00000000  *    â-          *
>        +0040:  00000000 42600000 00000000 00000000  *    â-          *
>        +0050:  0000EA15 00000000 032E1347 00000000  *  ²        å    *
>        +0060:  00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000  *                *
>        +0070:  00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000  *                *
>        +0080:  00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000  *                *
>        +0090:  00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000  *                *
>        +00A0:  00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000  *                *
> 
> 
> SMF Field:
> Offset
> D   H
> 52 34 R744STRC 8 l_float  The total number of IXLLIST, IXLCACHE, or IXLLOCK
> requests made. This field will not necessarily equal the sum 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to