I am a full-time mainframe (RACF) security engineer (I hate that term...) and 
have been for almost nine years.

Prior to that, I was a zOS (MFT, SVS, MVS, OS390, XA, ESA, etc.) systems 
programmer for approximately 30 years (for two very large companies that each 
have a 3-letter name).

IHMO, I was/am considered to be very good at both jobs.

The big difference was changing from a 60- to 80- hour work week to a 40-hour 
one....

Amazing how one adapts when outsourcing and "resource actions" come into play.



Randy

-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf 
Of John Gilmore
Sent: Monday, September 30, 2013 9:10 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Work long hours (Was Re: Pissing contest(s))

I am sure that outsourced security varies in quality and effectiveness, as does 
perforce 'outsourced' auditing.

My now extended observation of it in several mainframe shops has not, however, 
been encouraging.

Exclusive preoccupation with security seems to lead ineluctably to rigid, rote, 
highly standardized measures that make systems increasingly awkward and 
unworkable without in fact making them more secure.

It must be conceded that many of these deficiencies are not specific to 
security.  Suboptimizing, a department's pursuit of its own objectives at the 
expense of those of the organization it serves, is ubiquitous.

There is another problem too, and it is a harder to talk about politely.  I 
have never met a fulltime computer-security person for a mainframe shop who 
really knew much about the operating system he or she was attempting to defend. 
 Moreover, I have never met a highly competent z/OS or z/VM systems programmer 
who was willing to devote herself or himself exclusively to security for a 
single shop.  There is a severe, all but sui generis paucity of both talent and 
long experience with the target operating system among these security people; 
and it is not at all clear how these deficiencies can be remedied.

Part-time attention to security by a few talented, appropriately experienced 
people is all but certain to be much more effective than that given to it by a 
much larger group of dedicated mediocrities; but this notion is unpalatable to 
many CIOs for the obvious reason.

John Gilmore, Ashland, MA 01721 - USA

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
[email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to