On 1/10/2013 5:11 AM, Robert Prins wrote:
On 2013-09-30 16:40, Mike Schwab wrote:
Pascal is like an improved PL/I, Ada is an improved Pascal.

I would rather say that Pascal is a very inferior copy of PL/I.


I would have to humbly disagree. Pascals type system alone is far superior. I learned Pascal at school and never used it again. I programmed in PL/I professionally and IMO Pascal is a far cleaner language with more expressive features. Pascals successors, such as Module/2 and Delphi, widen the gap
even more. Wouldn't it be nice to have a dynamic string type in PL/I?

Robert

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to