>From my reading, the message occurs because more than one DCB is OPEN to
the same DD name, and that DD was allocated with FREE=CLOSE. We get the
same message from CA-JMR. The only solution is to "ding" CA to fix their
code. Which will likely get rejected as "Working As Designed". Which might
mean that somebody could "ding" IBM to make the message optional, somehow.


On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 9:34 AM, Lizette Koehler <[email protected]>wrote:

> Gadi,
>
> WE have verified that OPS/MVS has successfully removed the message from
> the console and SYSLOG.
>
> The next issue you have is the JOBLOG and JESMSGLG for the STC CA Spool.
>
> OPS/MVS can do some things with Routecde that might eliminate the issue.
>
> However, you might also look at the SPIN function in z/OS V1.13 to spin
> off the JOBLOG and JESMSGLG to remove it from your spool environment.
>
> If this message is a problem with number of messages, I would definitely
> go back to CA-SPOOL and push them to identify the cause and correct it.
>
> Also, the list may have better suggestions on how to remove the IEC988I
> from the STC Joblog and STC JESMSGLG.
>
> Lizette
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>



-- 
This is clearly another case of too many mad scientists, and not enough
hunchbacks.

Maranatha! <><
John McKown

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to