On 12 November 2013 18:31, Jim Mulder <d10j...@us.ibm.com> wrote: >>It's curious looked at as a whole. The very existence of an AMA527I >>suggests that PATH= is supported; it's an "I" message (nothing wrong), >>and there must be code to discover that PATH= was specified. [...] > TRSMAIN was an IBM internal tool which was written before > the advent of PATH= in MVS. When TRSMAIN morphed into > AMATERSE, there was no intention of adding PATH= support. > AMATERSE does a DEVTYPE, and checks DVACLASS (in IHADVA mapping). > If it is not x'80' (tape) or x'20' (DASD), then the AMA583E > meessage is issued. I don't know what will be in DVACLASS for > a Unix File System.
Ah - I get it. That text "..PATH=.SPECIFIED..." is in the DSNAME field (of the JFCB?); I had assumed that AMATERSE was actively checking for PATH=. Tony H. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
