On Wed, 4 Dec 2013 10:09:08 -0500, John Gilmore wrote: > >We're not dealing with what Google wishes to "honor", We're dealing >with the problem of resolving semantic ambiguity, which humans are >extraordinarily good at and even ther best AI methods cannot reaslly >cope with. > Watson? But how would Watson do on a NYT crossword puzzle? A recent example: the clue was "John Paul's successor". The answer, "Elena". (I got it mostly on intersecting words.) Resolving semantic ambiguity depends on lots of background, cultural context.
-- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
