>Would integrity be compromised somehow more by (from >my simplistic thinking) if I have a non-APF member in >JOBLIB/STEPLIB and the system fails the job with a S306 >than it would be compromised by bypassing the non-APF module >and loading and executing the same-named module from APF/LNKLST?
You are correct that that that implementation would not compromise the integrity (specifically the "integrity" that relates to security) but would compromise the integrity (the "integrity" that is used in a more general term as to correct operation). It would mean that, in general, the system when authorized could not reliably use link or load or attach in a user-submitted job - it might abend. Peter Relson z/OS Core Technology Design ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
