In <[email protected]>, on 01/17/2014 at 01:13 PM, Paul Gilmartin <[email protected]> said:
>*But* leave enough header information (Date: and From:) as >citation so the readercan refer to the full text of the cited >article in the Archives. Those that care about long established Internet conventions will use an attribution line rather than pointlessly copying extraneous data. Do you really believe that lines containing "Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 13:13:46 -0700" amd "From: Paul Gilmartin <[email protected]>" are clearer than a single line containing "In <[email protected]>, on 01/17/2014 at 01:13 PM, Paul Gilmartin <[email protected]> said:"? >(Shmuel will pay no attention.) Why don't you speak for yourself? Shmuel paid enough attention to note that you forgot about or were unaware of the Message-ID: header field. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html> We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress. (S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
