Bill Godfrey wrote: >Are you saying that the IN bit should be set for updates, and not for writing >new records, as a way of distinguishing between the two?
[... snipped ...] I think the documentation about those SMF records are somewhat not clear. I really wish someone from IBM Storage would comment on this thread about SMF 62 and 64. Groete / Greetings Elardus Engelbrecht ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
