On 2014-02-19, at 01:22, Hunkeler, Peter wrote: >>> I would TRS PACK the XMIT file, FTP it to target, then TRS UNPACK the >>> file, and receive. >>> >> Why? > > Because of the size of the XMTI file? Apart from that it doesn't help much > since also the tersed file needs to be copied to the target system where it > must be received into an FB1024 dataset. > A valid concern, but no help and perhaps a distraction when the OP was struggling with data corruption during the transfer process.
> I did however use TERSE instead of XMIT ... > "instead of" as opposed to "in addition to" is proper. Adding TRANSMIT adds overhead fields and increases the size of the TERSEd file and CPU time used. -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
