So break it again! We want to know!! :-) -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mark Pace Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2014 10:59 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: NODUMP
Good news/bad news. Good news, I fixed the problem, so no dump. Bad news, I don't know if adding the DD DUMMY would have done the trick. On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 11:17 AM, Burrell, C. Todd (CDC/OCOO/OCIO/ITSO) (CTR) <[email protected]> wrote: > That should do the trick. Give it a shot and tell the group if that does > not work... > > Todd Burrell, PMP, ITIL Expert, CISSP | Project Manager | ITSO AHB | > Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) > Contractor - HP Enterprise Services | 1600 Clifton Rd, Building 21, MS > D24, RM 1300 | Atlanta, GA 30338 | 404-971-7275 (Blackberry) > 404-723-2017(Mobile) | > [email protected] > > > THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE PROPRIETARY > MATERIAL and is for use only by the intended recipient. If you received > this in error, please notify the sender and delete the communication from > all computers. > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of Mark Pace > Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2014 11:10 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: NODUMP > > According to the output it is going to SMPSNAP. > > JESMSGLG JES2 > JESJCL JES2 > JESYSMSG JES2 > SMPOUT SMPER1 > SMPRPT SMPER1 > SYSPRINT SMPER1 > SMPSNAP SMPER1 > > So would a > //SMPSNAP DD DUMMY > remove the dump? > > > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 11:07 AM, Burrell, C. Todd (CDC/OCOO/OCIO/ITSO) > (CTR) <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Can't you just do something in the JCL like this: > > > > //SYSMDUMP DD DUMMY > > //SYSUDUMP DD DUMMY > > > > Not sure which DD it is going to, but if you dummy it you should not > > see a dump? > > > > Todd Burrell, PMP, ITIL Expert, CISSP | Project Manager | ITSO AHB | > > Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Contractor - HP > > Enterprise Services | 1600 Clifton Rd, Building 21, MS D24, RM 1300 | > > Atlanta, GA 30338 | 404-971-7275 (Blackberry) 404-723-2017(Mobile) | > > [email protected] > > > > > > THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE > > PROPRIETARY MATERIAL and is for use only by the intended recipient. If > > you received this in error, please notify the sender and delete the > > communication from all computers. > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] > > On Behalf Of Mark Pace > > Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2014 11:02 AM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: NODUMP > > > > Is there an equivalent of VSE // OPTION NODUMP ? > > > > I have a job that fails and produces a huge dump. I don't want the dump. > > Is there a way to suppress the dump being created? I searched the JCL The information contained in this message is confidential, protected from disclosure and may be legally privileged. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, distribution, copying, or any action taken or action omitted in reliance on it, is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to this message and destroy the material in its entirety, whether in electronic or hard copy format. Thank you. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
