Gibney, Dave wrote: >I would favor the fix the problem approach over the suppress the diagnostics >approach.
Indeed, because I find this statement from Mark D Pace very worrying: "I have a job that fails and produces a huge dump." What is the problem with that job? Did something changed before the job failed? Add your usual questions and dumps/traces here for diagnostics. But then I see: "Good news, I fixed the problem, so no dump." Mark, could you be kind to tell us, if you can, what the problem was and what fix you did? Rex Pommier wrote: >So break it again! We want to know!! :-) Yes! Agreed! For us to know and for the OP to earn some easy overtime money ... ;-) Groete / Greetings Elardus Engelbrecht ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
