In our case, we don't _do_ that. As you might have noticed, I check that the WTOR that I am replying to was issued on the same system as the OPS command is executing on. In any case, it would be the same as having two operators enter replies to the same WTOR at the same time. One would would be accepted, which would eliminate the WTOR number, so that the other would get a message like:IEE704I REPLY nn NOT OUTSTANDING
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 7:10 AM, Elardus Engelbrecht < [email protected]> wrote: > John McKown wrote: > > >We use CA-OPS/MVS. What we do is look at each outstanding WTOR and look > for the proper MSGID to which to reply. > > Curiousity question: > > What happens when you have CA-OPS/MVS (or Control-O [1] or such WTOR > scanner) on two or more LPARS [ in the same SysPlex] and they both pick up > the WTOR and then try to reply? > > (Warning: I have zero experience on OPS/MVS and IDMS. ;-p ) > > Just curious of course. > > Groete / Greetings > Elardus Engelbrecht > > [1] - I can try that out on a test sysplex, but I don't have now access to > it for now. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > -- Wasn't there something about a PASCAL programmer knowing the value of everything and the Wirth of nothing? Maranatha! <>< John McKown ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
