On Sat, 8 Mar 2014 08:41:57 -0500, Anne & Lynn Wheeler wrote: > >one of the issues pointed out about 3033 mvs/sp microcode assist >... sort-of targeted as the equivalent of ECPS for vm370 ... was that >3033 was already running close to one 370 instruction per machine cycle >(165 was 2.1/cycle, improved in 168 to 1.6/cycle and finally close to 1 >per cycle in 3033). ... > Isn't this telling me that relative to the "machine cycle" (perhaps a moving target), the 168 outperforms the 3033, and the 165 is better yet?
-- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
