l...@garlic.com (Anne & Lynn Wheeler) writes: > for a time I used to report to the same executive as the guy responsible > for APPN ... when it came time to announce, the communication group > non-concurred and objected to the announcement ... after several weeks, > the APPN announcement letter was carefully rewritten so not to imply any > relationship between APPN and SNA ... now they try and pretend that SNA > and APPN are somehow related (somewhat like doublethink out of 1984, > arbitrarily redefine words to mean whatever you want them to mean) > http://docwiki.cisco.com/wiki/IBM_Systems_Network_Architecture_Protocols > > I would periodically bug him about coming over and working on real > networking.
re: http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2014d.html#50 Can we logon to TSO witout having TN3270 up ? and i just got thru pointing out that the communication group did everything possible to make sure that anybody would confuse that APPN was in any way related to SNA (see figure and then what the paragraph talks about): http://www.eetimes.com/document.asp?doc_id=1321377&image_number=7 -- virtualization experience starting Jan1968, online at home since Mar1970 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
