On Tue, 25 Mar 2014 13:57:16 -0400, Gord Tomlin wrote: > >If you are already using LE and XPLINK for the nedit C code, then I'm >not sure I see the benefit to writing a Metal C subroutine to do the >ENQ/DEQ. The C code in this case will likely be mostly comprised of >inline Assembler with the cryptic syntax used to map C constructs to >Assembler constructs. Your code will probably be more understandable if >you write a LE-compliant Assembler subroutine to do those functions. > Wouldn't it be nice if all the header files were trilingual? Assembler/PLS/Metal C? It'll take a while.
-- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
