In <[email protected]>, on
03/26/2014
at 06:03 PM, "Gibney, Dave" <[email protected]> said:
>I think that some of this is a real difference between the way the
>two protocols work.
Not that I can see.
>I think that some of this is a real difference between the way the
>two protocols work. Using FTP, I can submit a given JCL deck to any
>host I have access to and authority to run.
No you can't. You can submit a given JCL file to the primary JES on
any host running an FTP server that you have access to. You can't
control what node and member it runs on without modifying the JCL.
>I haven't actually used NJE much, but I don't think it supports
>changing the NJE target from outside the JCL deck. The /*ROUTE XEQ
>(inside the JCL deck) is the method for specifying the target node.
The methods are not part of the NJE protocl, and /*ROUTE is not the
only method.
>On the other hand, /*ROUTE XEQ LOCAL seems equivalent to an FTP open
>localhost,
No.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
