In <[email protected]>, on
03/24/2014
at 07:11 AM, Paul Gilmartin <[email protected]> said:
>I can use FTP (a TCP/IP protocol) to submit jobs to localhost. I
>do not need multiple TCP/IP stacks to do this;
What does that have to do with the price of eggs in China? I asked for
differences, not similarities. The question was and remains in what
sense TCP/IP is more tolerant than SNA.
>Generally, TCP/IP-based protocols such as FTP, HTTP, SSH, ... can
>communicate with localhost with no special configuration.
Again, that's a similarity rather than a difference, unless you are
claiming that, e.g., an FTP server can communicate with itself over
TCP/IP.
>The discussion here indicates that to use NJE to submit jobs or
>otherwise communicate with the local host requires some unusual
>configuration such as multiple instances of JES or multiple
>instances of NJE.
Not even close.
>So, I perceive TCP/IP as more tolerant;
That perception appears to be based on something other than facts.
>it has no bias against the local host.
Neither does SNA.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
