On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 11:44 AM, Paul Gilmartin <paulgboul...@aim.com>wrote:
<snip> > > Is there any way to limit authorized invocation of a utility to selected > users > and allow all others to invoke it unauthorized? Of course a copy could be > installed in a non-authorized library. > At present, there is no way to have a single copy of a program run with APF authorization based simply on a RACF profile. As I understand it, the program loader in the initiator will set the APF auth bit if (1) the program from the EXEC PGM= is marked AC(1), and (2) it is loaded from an authorized library. > > (Several years ago, I discovered that SMP/E worked pretty well unauthorized > as long as I avoided functions that invoke IEBCOPY (I know), ahd used > NOWAIT > on all my DDDEFs. Don't know about AMASPZAP; skeptical about ADRDSSU. > But I disagree strongly with those who will probably argue here that only > storage administrators have justifiable use for ADRDSSU. Elitism.) > I don't mind _anybody_ using a program _which they know how to use_. ADRDSSU is generally not one of those. Unfortunately, around here, I sometimes wonder about the COBOL compiler too. > > -- gil > > -- There is nothing more pleasant than traveling and meeting new people! Genghis Khan Maranatha! <>< John McKown ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
