On Wed, 9 Apr 2014 11:03:39 -0500, Paul Gilmartin wrote: >I suspect the objective is to eliminate PDS entirely. Simpler is better, and >PDSE is simpler than PDSE + PDS.
broken != simpler. Do you not recall the discussion (!) re PDSE enforcement for Cobol 5 recently ?. That is unworkable for shops that are (for example) a ring of monoplexes. NUCLEUS as PDSE in such cases would be madness - or is the expectation that NUCLEUS doesn't need latch protection ?. Shane ... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
