No developer would be arrogant enough :-) to consider themselves faultless. And knowing Sri Hari as I do I doubt he'd want you to keep the solution to yourself. And we all learn by building on each others' solutions and ideas.
Which is why *I* for one have been socialising my "answers" for almost 30 years. Others likewise and some even longer. However what we have here is a discussion that has little structure now. :-( Cheers, Martin Martin Packer, zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator, Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM +44-7802-245-584 email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker Blog: https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/blogs/MartinPacker From: "Sankaranarayanan, Vignesh" <vignesh.v.sankaranaraya...@marks-and-spencer.com> To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu Date: 18/04/2014 00:40 Subject: Re: Forget: Sorting CSV data that begins with an IP address Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu> Ok .. Just a thought though .. when I get a solution from a DFSORT developer himself, I can blindly believe that it will work; as long as I had made my requirements clear, which I had. But yes, I do see your point. - Vignesh Mainframe Admin -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Gibney, Dave Sent: 17 April 2014 22:16 To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Forget: Sorting CSV data that begins with an IP address Don't reply off list and deprive others from knowing the solution(s). Also, keeps the archives more useful. > -----Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] > On Behalf Of Sankaranarayanan, Vignesh > Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2014 12:35 PM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: Forget: Sorting CSV data that begins with an IP address > > Sorry Kolusu, thought I replied to your email off the list. Your > solution works, thank you. > > And from cursory looks, and trial runs, it looks like other suggested > solutions work too. > > So my or original problem has been solved, thanks to you guys. > > Now I'm just mulling about cutting the execution time. > > - Vignesh > Mainframe admin > > On Apr 17, 2014 8:32:12 PM, Sri h Kolusu <skol...@us.ibm.com> wrote: > > Sankaranarayanan Vignesh > > You keep asking questions but never let us know the outcome of the > proposed solutions. You started the topic for DFSORT about Sorting > the csv file and a couple of solutions were provided to you. If the > proposed solution did not work then may be should have shown us a > sample and then may be we could have fixed that issue. Did you try out > the solution posted by me earlier? If so what is the outcome of that? Did you get the desired results? > > Thanks, > Kolusu > DFSORT Development > > IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu> wrote on > 04/17/2014 12:26:17 PM: > > > From: "Sankaranarayanan, Vignesh" > <Vignesh.V.Sankaranarayanan@MARKS- > > AND-SPENCER.COM> > > To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu, > > Date: 04/17/2014 12:26 PM > > Subject: Re: Forget: Sorting CSV data that begins with an IP address > > Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu> > > > > Ok.. Is it possible to fire off other REXXes repetitively (let's say > > 2 or 3, each doing one function) that will not RETURN to the main, > > but write their output to a dataset once done? > > > > - Vignesh > > Mainframe admin > > > > On Apr 17, 2014 8:16:45 PM, "Farley, Peter x23353" > > <peter.far...@broadridge.com> wrote: > > > > TSO Rexx does not support multiple tasks executing simultaneously. > > The "ATTACH*" functions do attach a new task, but your attaching > > Rexx waits synchronously for the attached task to complete. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > ] > > On Behalf Of Sankaranarayanan, Vignesh > > Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2014 2:58 PM > > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > > Subject: Re: Forget: Sorting CSV data that begins with an IP address > > > > Another question. > > > > I'm looping some 5000 times in REXX and doing functions (NetView > > ping, SNMP walk, etc) sequentially. They don't necessarily need to > > be sequential. I'm just going through a list of printers and I want > > to test them. > > > > So.. Is it possible that I make the first run a data run - reading > > parameters from files for each printer (reading PDS member) - and > > the second run as a thread creator of sorts. Each thread going off > > to test one printer. > > > > The first run should be almost instantaneous. My thinking is.. Is it > > possible to parallelly do the pinging and SNMP connection bits. It > > would cut 20 minutes runtime to just a couple. > > > > -- > > > > > > This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of > > the addressee and may contain information that is privileged and > > confidential. If the reader of the message is not the intended > > recipient or an authorized representative of the intended recipient, > > you are hereby notified that any dissemination of this communication > > is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in > > error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and delete the message > > and any attachments from your system. > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO > > IBM-MAIN > > > > MARKSANDSPENCER.COM > > ________________________________ > > Unless otherwise stated above: > > Marks and Spencer plc > > Registered Office: > > Waterside House > > 35 North Wharf Road > > London > > W2 1NW > > > > Registered No. 214436 in England and Wales. > > > > Telephone (020) 7935 4422 > > Facsimile (020) 7487 2670 > > > > www.marksandspencer.com > > > > Please note that electronic mail may be monitored. > > > > This e-mail is confidential. If you received it by mistake, please > > let us know and then delete it from your system; you should not > > copy, disclose, or distribute its contents to anyone nor act in > > reliance on this e-mail, as this is prohibited and may be unlawful. > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO > > IBM-MAIN > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send > email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send > email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN Unless stated otherwise above: IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598. Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
