In
<of87d06c78.43f4a289-on80257cc2.002a9f6c-80257cc2.002c3...@uk.ibm.com>,
on 04/22/2014
at 09:02 AM, Martin Packer <[email protected]> said:
>VIO has, in any case, been seen as CPU expensive. Because it's
>simulating a device. I would, however, quite like to see VIO in
>Memory reborn - with a huge (EAV) device type.
Why? I'd much rather have memory mapped[B|P|Q]SAM support and cut out
the extra CKD simulation (on top of the CKD simulation in the DASD
subsytem.)
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
