I think this might be APARable. Its worth a try.
Ed
On May 2, 2014, at 11:15 AM, Phil Sidler wrote:
At one time I set up IEBUPDTE (or SMP/E USERMOD ++MACUPD) jobs to
update some IBM sample programs before I used them to make it
easier to tell what was updated from the supplied source and
possible make migration to new releases easier. Now, going to a
new CICS release, the sample programs no longer have sequence
numbers. This breaks my IEBUPDTE process for sure. (It also
breaks ISPF COMPARE to see what has changed!) Perhaps someone can
save me some time and tell me what they're doing for this?
TIA,...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
