On Sat, 3 May 2014 23:09:01 -0600, Paul Gilmartin <[email protected]> wrote:
>On 2014-05-02, at 12:04, Jousma, David wrote: > >> As for your question, my suggestion is to instead of using IEBUPDTE >> statements, is to copy the entire source program, and make a SMPE >Replacing an elegantly automated process with a crude and >tedious manual one. Sigh. > >An alternative to IEBUPDTE is "patch", supplied by z/OS, >which does not require sequence numbers. Patch is much >improved if you have "diff3", not supplied by z/OS, but >readily available elsewhere. Thanks for the suggestions. I ending up using TSO EDIT in a batch job. A fairly easy conversion from the IEBUPDTE control statements, though I understand some of the pitfalls with this solution. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
