"NUM OFF" should display the full 80 bytes with the numbers (if they were there in the first place). It should not blank them.
Were there line numbers in the first place or were they blank to start with? Try using the commands manually rather than in the exec. Use PF10/PF11 to display the line number columns before you issue NUM OFF. Do the line numbers disappear? Why are you bothering with "NUM OFF" and bounds? ISREDIT (XX) = LINE 1 is unaffected by those commands. Be aware that the low level qualifier sets the edit profile and previous setting may have been retained. E.g. first view/edit works fine but the second is already in UNNUM mode. There is an ISPF listserv that is probably more relevant, so you may want to ask there. Jon Perryman On Tuesday, May 6, 2014 11:29 AM, "Hardee, Chuck" <chuck.har...@thermofisher.com> wrote: You tried "NUM OFF", what about "NONUMBER"? > >-----Original Message----- >From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On >Behalf Of Jon Butler > >I have a problem where I need to Edit/view source code to vet it for >compliance to corporate standards. It may be COBOL, PL/I, etc. I have the >following in one Exec > >ADDRESS ISPEXEC "VIEW DATASET ('"my_pdse_member"') MACRO(my_macro) > >and in my_macro, where I do the vetting, I have the following > >ADDRESS ISREDIT 'MACRO' > >I've tried "NUMOFF" "BOUNDS = 1,80" but the problem remains that the first six >characters of the member I'm trying to edit are always blanked out. I'm >guessing the VIEW/EDIT is using them to sequence its working dataset. Not too >bad for COBOL source, but a bummer for PL/I or assembler. > >Any advice as to how I can get all 80 bytes of the source code? > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
