On Mon, 12 May 2014 11:35:44 -0700, Ed Jaffe <[email protected]> wrote:
>On 5/12/2014 11:08 AM, Walt Farrell wrote: >> With your SRL R1,5 you end up with multiplying the original doubleword >> length by 8. > >I assumed that was the intent, based on the comment in the code about >the returned length being in doublewords. Oops. Yes, I see what you mean; I did the math backward. -- Walt ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
