In <[email protected]>, on 07/30/2014
at 08:10 AM, Charles Mills <[email protected]> said:
>I think SHARE would be better off with a little less of an "old boys'
>club" approach to attendance.
I can't recall a time when Share management wasn't actively seeking
new blood, but they can't force people to volunteer nor can they
compel members to support employees who wish to volunteer.
>I didn't start this thread. If you think that newcomers having to
>ask on a forum "how the heck do I go to my first SHARE?" is
>satisfactory, then I guess all is well with how SHARE does things
>today.
I don't recall anybody suggesting that it was satisfactory, just that
it doesn't support the claim that Share is trying to exclude new
members.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
