John McKown wrote: >That sounds good to me. But, me being me, I would caution your friend in one >regard. That manual is most likely copyrighted. If it is, then scanning it and >uploading it _might_ result in prosecution. Especially if the copyright holder >objects.
But the copyright statements, owner names, emblems, etc, are also scanned in? Should this not be a relief for bitsavers? Unless the owner objects of course... >the actions of some "copyright trolls", Shoot them, they [ and lame tree-huggers ] are very bored with lots of money to spend. ;-) But, then they're absolutely very tiring to all with common sense, is there not a law banning these 'trolls'? :-( >I would be _very_ cautious. Indeed, thanks for the heads-up to the OP. Groete / Greetings Elardus Engelbrecht ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
