Thanks for the OLP output. A fix should be on its way tp me soon. Yours truly, John T. Abell President International Software Products Tel: 800-295-7608 Ext: 224 International: 1-416-593-5578 Ext: 224 Fax: 800-295-7609 International: 1-416-593-5579
E-mail: john.ab...@intnlsoftwareproducts.com Web: www.ispinfo.com This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review, use, retention, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive on behalf of the named recipient), please contact the sender by reply email and delete all copies of this message. Also,email is susceptible to data corruption, interception, tampering, unauthorized amendment and viruses. We only send and receive emails on the basis that we are not liable for any such corruption, interception, tampering, amendment or viruses or any consequence thereof. -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Scott Ford Sent: Monday, September 22, 2014 10:45 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: COBOL "LINK" without Assembler? Kirk: I called A Cobol routine(s) in C without an issue …threaded , the threads started in C. I have code if you would like to see Regards, Scott www.identityforge.com From: Kirk Wolf Sent: Monday, September 22, 2014 10:38 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Thanks Don, That is a pretty good idea, but not quite what I was looking for since BPX1ATM would not be synchronous. I suppose that I could follow it with BPX1WAT to reap the child process return code. So this combination is probably one way to do it without Assembler. Kirk Wolf Dovetailed Technologies http://dovetail.com On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 9:21 AM, Don Poitras <poit...@pobox.com> wrote: > I would think you could call BPX1ATM (attach_execmvs()) from COBOL. > > In article <CAHm_n2k3Y6YPjiF30BFYBhqFhvSgo0dub2wdVNne2K= > tl8b...@mail.gmail.com> you wrote: > > We have a batch utility program that is built in C that uses the XPLINK > > version of the C runtime. A customer would like to "dynamically" call > > this from COBOL, but of course the LE runtimes are not compatible: > > > IGZ0179S A dynamic call to COZBATCH failed because the load module > contains > > one > > or more routines with XPLINK linkage. > > > > Is it possible to do the equivalent of a Assembler "LINK" (separate > > RB > and > > LE runtime environment) from COBOL without writing an Assembler stub > > routine? > > > Thanks, > > > Kirk Wolf > > Dovetailed Technologies > > http://dovetail.com > > -- > Don Poitras - SAS Development - SAS Institute Inc. - SAS Campus Drive > sas...@sas.com (919) 531-5637 Cary, NC 27513 > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send > email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN --- This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. http://www.avast.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
