In <[email protected]>, on 10/02/2014
at 08:45 AM, Charles Mills <[email protected]> said:
>Of course, the real harm in not removing unreachable code is
>pretty modest IMHO.
That depends on *why* it is unreachable. If it is something that you
once needed but no longer do, that's one thing, but if it's something
that you need but don't call then you've got problems.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
