Unfortunately, IRRDBU00 does not unload PROFILE options, including PREFIX, and therefore, it is unlike to detect an error in this field. I doubt any of the RACF utilities would detect this error. IRRUT200 performs checks on the integrity of the index and block availability masks but not on the content of the profiles. My advice to the OP would be to delete the TSO segment and recreate it just in case there are other problems with the information stored in RACF for this user.
Regards, Bob Robert S. Hansel Lead RACF Specialist RSH Consulting, Inc. 617-969-8211 www.linkedin.com/in/roberthansel http://twitter.com/RSH_RACF www.rshconsulting.com ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 2014-2015 RACF Training - Intro & Basic Admin - WebEx - DEC 8-12, 2014 - Securing z/OS UNIX - WebEx - FEB 3-6, 2015 - Intro & Basic Admin - WebEx - MAR 23-27, 2015 - Audit & Compliance Roadmap - Boston - APR 21-24, 2015 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- -----Original Message----- Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 11:45:35 -0400 From: Thomas Conley <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Has Anyone Seen this in ISPF before? On 10/29/2014 11:35 AM, [email protected] wrote: > OK. Thanks. We are using RACF. What would dump? I will forward this to my > boss to see what he wants to do. > > IRRDBU00 will unload your RACF database to a flat file. Also, look at the IRRUT100, IRRUT200, and IRRUT400 utilities. One of them has a function to test the integrity of your RACF database. Good luck. Regards, Tom Conley ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
