Well, OK, if I must be exact about it I really meant ISO-8859-1, the Latin-1 page -- but then if the FM writers meant ISO-8859-1 the FM would have (I hope) said so. I should have just taken the FM at its word and said ASCII instead.
"... not potable ..." Good one! <vbg> indeed, thank you for lightening my day. Peter -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) Sent: Monday, November 03, 2014 5:23 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: C Language: non-EBCDIC characters in literal strings. In <985915eee6984740ae93f8495c624c6c233b3c5...@jscpcwexmaa1.bsg.ad.adp.com>, on 11/03/2014 at 10:51 AM, "Farley, Peter x23353" <[email protected]> said: >ascname DC CA'characters you want in ISO8859 here' Note: I am >ASSUMing that type CA means ISO8859! DC CA means ASCII; there is no ISO8859, only ISO-8859-x for various values of x. HLASM does allow you to provide your own translate table, but then the source code is not potable (sic <g>) to a different build environment. -- This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the addressee and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If the reader of the message is not the intended recipient or an authorized representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and delete the message and any attachments from your system. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
