In <007401cff7bc$8a6ceb60$9f46c220$@mxg.com>, on 11/03/2014
at 05:18 PM, Barry Merrill <ba...@mxg.com> said:
>I'm totally confused. Why would it NOT be better to have a User
>Return Code that explains the single 0C1 or 0C4 (of which I've had
>so many, they are Oh-Chuck4's instead of the more formal
>Oh-Charlie4) or OC7 value. How is that less useful?
Besides confusing the user, it makes it harder to locate the
diagnostic data. That could be ameliorated with better documentation,
but don't hold your breath.
LE PC handling reminds me of the old FORTRAN SPIE code. What's the
emoticon for runs away, shrieking in despair, disgust and terror?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
