Are both z/OS 2.1 and 1.13 running as guests under z/VM? Lizette
-----Original Message----- >From: Frank Chu <[email protected]> >Sent: Dec 5, 2014 10:24 AM >To: [email protected] >Subject: Setting up a sysplex and OMVS/zFS > >Hello, > > > >I am trying to set up sysplex based on the zPDT starter system between >zOS 2.1 and zOS 1.13. Everything generally works except when attempting >to mount various OMVS/zFS datasets on the second system I bring up. Both >systems have their own volumes containing their own OMVS/zFS system, so >I'm not attempting to mount a single dataset on two different systems. > > >After zVM and zOS 2.1 has been brought online, I IPL zOS 1.13. >Everything goes until the zFS/OMVS starts. Then I get around 10 of the >following messages: > > >N 4020000 S0W2 14333 19:37:00.97 STC00206 00000090 IOEZ00046E Error 129 >received while attaching aggregate ZFS.Z21H.FONTS >M 4000000 S0W2 14333 19:37:01.05 00000090 BPXF221I FILE SYSTEM >ZFS.Z21H.FONTS 265 >D 265 00000090 FAILED TO 4 LOCALLY. >D 265 00000090 RETURN CODE = 00000081, REASON CODE = EF1869CD >D 265 00000090 THE FILE SYSTEM IS ACCESSIBLE ON THIS SYSTEM THROUGH >E 265 00000090 A MOUNT ON A REMOTE SYSTEM. > > >N 4020000 S0W2 14333 19:37:01.76 STC00206 00000090 IOEZ00046E Error 129 >received while attaching aggregate CSQ800.ZFS >M 4000000 S0W2 14333 19:37:01.85 00000090 BPXF221I FILE SYSTEM >CSQ800.ZFS 267 >D 267 00000090 FAILED TO MOUNT LOCALLY. >D 267 00000090 RETURN CODE = 00000081, REASON CODE = EF1869CD >D 267 00000090 THE FILE SYSTEM IS ACCESSIBLE ON THIS SYSTEM THROUGH >E 267 00000090 A MOUNT ON A REMOTE SYSTEM. > > > > >All the messages refer to datasets at are only available to the zOS 2.1 >system. They are not being mounted on the zOS 1.13 system and I don't >want them to be. The RETURN CODE indicates that the "file was not >found", does that mean I should mount the z2.1 dasd volumes in zOS 1.13? > > > > > >I'm also getting messages on the zOS 1.13 system indicating that the >file system it is attempting to mount is already mounted. Which doesn't >make sense. IBM doc says to correct the error in BPXPRMxx but I don't >see anything wrong with it and the zOS 1.13 system IPLs just fine by >itself with this BPXPRMxx member. > > > >BPXF237I FILE SYSTEM ZFS.ADCD113H.SYSTEM 326 >WAS ALREADY MOUNTED ON PATHNAME >/S0W2. > > > >BPXF237I FILE SYSTEM ZFS.Z113H.VERSION 327 >WAS ALREADY MOUNTED ON PATHNAME >/Z113H. > > > > > > >Any ideas or suggestions? > > >Thanks >Frank > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >-- >Development Programmer >ColeSoft Marketing >www.colesoft.com >Phone : 540.456.6164 >Email : [email protected] > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- >For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, >send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
