Yep. zVM 6.2
Frank
On 12/5/2014 12:29 PM, Lizette Koehler wrote:
Are both z/OS 2.1 and 1.13 running as guests under z/VM?
Lizette
-----Original Message-----
From: Frank Chu <[email protected]>
Sent: Dec 5, 2014 10:24 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Setting up a sysplex and OMVS/zFS
Hello,
I am trying to set up sysplex based on the zPDT starter system between
zOS 2.1 and zOS 1.13. Everything generally works except when attempting
to mount various OMVS/zFS datasets on the second system I bring up. Both
systems have their own volumes containing their own OMVS/zFS system, so
I'm not attempting to mount a single dataset on two different systems.
After zVM and zOS 2.1 has been brought online, I IPL zOS 1.13.
Everything goes until the zFS/OMVS starts. Then I get around 10 of the
following messages:
N 4020000 S0W2 14333 19:37:00.97 STC00206 00000090 IOEZ00046E Error 129
received while attaching aggregate ZFS.Z21H.FONTS
M 4000000 S0W2 14333 19:37:01.05 00000090 BPXF221I FILE SYSTEM
ZFS.Z21H.FONTS 265
D 265 00000090 FAILED TO 4 LOCALLY.
D 265 00000090 RETURN CODE = 00000081, REASON CODE = EF1869CD
D 265 00000090 THE FILE SYSTEM IS ACCESSIBLE ON THIS SYSTEM THROUGH
E 265 00000090 A MOUNT ON A REMOTE SYSTEM.
N 4020000 S0W2 14333 19:37:01.76 STC00206 00000090 IOEZ00046E Error 129
received while attaching aggregate CSQ800.ZFS
M 4000000 S0W2 14333 19:37:01.85 00000090 BPXF221I FILE SYSTEM
CSQ800.ZFS 267
D 267 00000090 FAILED TO MOUNT LOCALLY.
D 267 00000090 RETURN CODE = 00000081, REASON CODE = EF1869CD
D 267 00000090 THE FILE SYSTEM IS ACCESSIBLE ON THIS SYSTEM THROUGH
E 267 00000090 A MOUNT ON A REMOTE SYSTEM.
All the messages refer to datasets at are only available to the zOS 2.1
system. They are not being mounted on the zOS 1.13 system and I don't
want them to be. The RETURN CODE indicates that the "file was not
found", does that mean I should mount the z2.1 dasd volumes in zOS 1.13?
I'm also getting messages on the zOS 1.13 system indicating that the
file system it is attempting to mount is already mounted. Which doesn't
make sense. IBM doc says to correct the error in BPXPRMxx but I don't
see anything wrong with it and the zOS 1.13 system IPLs just fine by
itself with this BPXPRMxx member.
BPXF237I FILE SYSTEM ZFS.ADCD113H.SYSTEM 326
WAS ALREADY MOUNTED ON PATHNAME
/S0W2.
BPXF237I FILE SYSTEM ZFS.Z113H.VERSION 327
WAS ALREADY MOUNTED ON PATHNAME
/Z113H.
Any ideas or suggestions?
Thanks
Frank
--
Development Programmer
ColeSoft Marketing
www.colesoft.com
Phone : 540.456.6164
Email : [email protected]
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
--
Development Programmer
ColeSoft Marketing
www.colesoft.com
Phone : 540.456.6164
Email : [email protected]
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
