> -----Original Message-----
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Ed Gould
> Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 11:42 PM
>
> On Dec 11, 2014, at 7:11 AM, Peter Relson wrote:
>
> > Curiosity/Impact questions
> >
> > PROGxx has existed for almost 25 years, and support within there for
> > dynamic LNKLST for almost 20 years.
> >
> > We're looking at some new work for which we likely won't change the
> > LNKLSTxx path, thus requiring use of PROGxx for defining the LNKLST in
> > order to use the new functionality.
>
> Peter:
>
> Yes we use the old linklst member(s)
> Trying to teach the new people about the new format is lets say less than
> fruitful.
> The old format is prefect as it is and IMO no changes to existing format
> would be welcome.
I thought you retired a millennium ago.
-jc-
**********************************************************************
Information contained in this e-mail message and in any attachments thereto is
confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy this
message, delete any copies held on your systems, notify the sender immediately,
and refrain from using or disclosing all or any part of its content to any
other person.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
