On Dec 12, 2014, at 12:10 AM, Chase, John wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Ed Gould
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 11:42 PM
On Dec 11, 2014, at 7:11 AM, Peter Relson wrote:
Curiosity/Impact questions
PROGxx has existed for almost 25 years, and support within there for
dynamic LNKLST for almost 20 years.
We're looking at some new work for which we likely won't change the
LNKLSTxx path, thus requiring use of PROGxx for defining the
LNKLST in
order to use the new functionality.
Peter:
Yes we use the old linklst member(s)
Trying to teach the new people about the new format is lets say
less than fruitful.
The old format is prefect as it is and IMO no changes to existing
format would be welcome.
I thought you retired a millennium ago.
John:
I still do consulting on the side(gratis) to non profits.
Ed
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
