On Mon, 5 Jan 2015 08:16:26 -0500 Peter Relson <[email protected]> wrote:

:>>What is the exact format of the LIST64 parameter. It is not clear if the
:>>counts and lengths include a slack four bytes (like the SUMLIST64 
:>parameter).

:>SUMLIST64 does have 4 reserved bytes after the field containing the 
:>length. LIST64 does not. The description in the book really is correct in 
:>saying that the LIST64 format is analogous to the LISTD format.   The 
:>first word is the only length field. The book indicates correctly "When 
:>LIST64=list addr is specified, the first fullword of the storage list 
:>contains the number of bytes, including the first word, in the list."  I 
:>don't understand why you mention the counts since those are unrelated to 
:>lengths.

:>I will suggest an addition to "The LIST64 storage list format is exactly 
:>analogous to the LISTD storage list format" of something like "with 
:>8-byte-long starting and ending addresses"

IOW,

Length ds f
stoken ds xl8
number_of ranges ds f
Ranges ds (2*x)D


:>>As SDUMPX with a DCB only does HOME, will a SVC entered SDUMPX ever have 
:>the
:>>ECB posted or will the dump always be complete upon return from the DCB.
:>
:>I don't know what "upon return from the DCB" means. Perhaps you meant 
:>"from the SVC"?  In any case, your "or" does not represent mutually 
:>exclusive conditions. When you return from the SVC (assuming a valid 
:>return code), both the ECB will be posted and also the dump will be 
:>complete if it is a synchronous dump. The doc for ECB does mention (under 
:>A-type) "posted on completion of a scheduled dump". I suspect that that is 
:>true but a bit misleading, in that the ECB is (very likely, but it would 
:>need to be verified) posted on completion of the dump, whether the dump is 
:>scheduled or synchronous.
:>
:>I did notice under ECB "Note that these interfaces will not be driven if 
:>the call to SDUMPX results in a non-zero return code.".
:>I believe this is incorrect. It should say "...results in a return code 
:>greater than 4" which matches the wording for return code 04 that 
:>describes the ECB being posted for that case. 

In my case the dump completed (I only used SUMLIST64) with RC=0 but the ECB
was not posted.

--
Binyamin Dissen <[email protected]>
http://www.dissensoftware.com

Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel


Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me,
you should preauthorize the dissensoftware.com domain.

I very rarely bother responding to challenge/response systems,
especially those from irresponsible companies.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to