On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 1:53 PM, Chase, John <[email protected]> wrote:

> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of John McKown
> > Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2015 1:49 PM
> >
> > I'm reading the Redbook mentioned by Timothy Stipples on the z13. Some
> "interesting" things, to me.
> >
> > [ snip ]
> > 10) Curious statement:
> > <quote>
> > If only Linux on z Systems is to be run under z/VM, then a z/VM mode
> LPAR is not required, and we
> > suggest that a Linux-only LPAR be used instead.
> > </quote>
>

​Ah. The verbiage was ​misleading, to me, due to my lack of knowledge about
z/VM and z/Linux. I read that as in an LPAR _without_ z/VM. But in a
Linux-only defined LPAR running multiple Linux guests under z/VM makes a
lot more sense. I don't know how my eyes just skipped over the "under z/MV"
at the front part of the sentence. Perhaps this is why my high school
English teacher kept scolding me for using long sentences.



>
> I believe that's because z/VM is "significantly cheaper" if run in an
> IFL-only LPAR.
>
>     -jc-
>


-- 
​
While a transcendent vocabulary is laudable, one must be eternally careful
so that the calculated objective of communication does not become ensconced
in obscurity.  In other words, eschew obfuscation.

111,111,111 x 111,111,111 = 12,345,678,987,654,321

Maranatha! <><
John McKown

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to