> -----Original Message-----
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]]
> On Behalf Of Shane Ginnane
> Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2015 3:03 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: z13 "new"(?) characteristics from RedBook
> 
> On Thu, 15 Jan 2015 13:18:08 -0700, Mark Post wrote:
> 
> >>>> On 1/15/2015 at 02:53 PM, "Chase, John" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> I believe that's because z/VM is "significantly cheaper" if run in an
> >> IFL-only LPAR.
> >
> >That certainly used to be true, but I'm not at all sure it still is the 
> >case.  If I'm
> remembering right, z/VM licensing is the same for both CPs and IFLs.  It's 
> just
> that if you _do_ have a machine with both and you create a z/VM mode LPAR,
> then the z/VM licensing algorithm includes _all_ those processors instead of
> just CPs or just IFLs.
> 
> I note a SoD to include KVM on the z13.
> Hopefully this should allow configurations that make this debate moot - z/VM
> should be not needed at all.

If you can live with 85 or less zLinux instances :)

> I wonder how that affects SUSE install scripts ...
> 
> Shane ...
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to
> [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to