> -----Original Message-----
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of John McKown
>
> On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 8:53 AM, Chase, John <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Sam Siegel
> > >
> > > The question of the day is, were the balls fully inflated our not?
> >
> > Precisely define "fully inflated". Dig me up when everybody's
> > satisfied with your definition. :-)
> >
> > -jc-
> >
> >
> I am not a football person, but listening on the radio this morning, NFL
> rules state what the psi of
> the air in the ball is supposed to be. The psi in the ball under discussion
> was less that what is
> allowed by the NFL rules, and thus the ball was not "fully inflated". Or,
> better stated: the ball did
> not meet NFL inflation standards.
If there is evidence, then "let's go to trial".
-jc-
**********************************************************************
Information contained in this e-mail message and in any attachments thereto is
confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy this
message, delete any copies held on your systems, notify the sender immediately,
and refrain from using or disclosing all or any part of its content to any
other person.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
