In <[email protected]>, on 02/20/2015
at 09:25 AM, Thomas Conley <[email protected]> said:
>After reading this technote, all I can say is "Just....wow".
>Instead of CA creating an option or a command to refresh the
>security profiles (that would involve CODING, can't do that), we
>have to hack a zap into an SMP/E maintained module without a
>usermod, then remember to rehack it every time we apply
>maintenance. No wonder people complain about how difficult it is
>to maintain mainframe software.
How does a poor maintenance policy at one vendor translate into a
blanket condemnation of mainframe software?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
