I'm with you Scott ... I like to have the pdf on local disk. On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 7:24 AM, Scott Ford <idfzos...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I would rather download the PDFs,I'm think personally, it's easier more me. > > On Wednesday, March 11, 2015, Staller, Allan <allan.stal...@kbmg.com> > wrote: > > > The "new tools" are not as available, reliable, or efficient as their > > predecessors [1]. > > > > [1] In a bout of frustration I complained to a duty manager about the > > performance and availability of one of the "new tools". > > I was informed that it was still the same old green screen application > w/a > > GUI front end. It was the front end that was causing the > > performance/availability issues, not the "old tool" . Score 1 for the > > PFCSK's. > > > > <snip> > > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > > <javascript:;>] On Behalf Of Shane Ginnane > > Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2015 7:09 PM > > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU <javascript:;> > > Subject: Knowledgecentre versus the library server > > > > Reading Kolosu's latest admonishment to gil, I trundled through the links > > for completeness. > > The first (knowledgecentre) took minutes to load - yes *minutes*. The > > others just "popped up". > > > > Another great technological leap backwards. > > </snip> > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu <javascript:;> with the message: > > INFO IBM-MAIN > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
